The 2025 Magic Quadrant for Account-Based Marketing Platforms is the first edition in which the category stopped being about advertising. Three of the eight vendors from the 2024 field did not return. The three Leaders at the top of the November 6, 2025 scorecard are all, underneath the ABM label, data companies.
Not one of them leads with media. 6sense wins on predictive AI trained on intent data and the account graph. ZoomInfo wins on the GTM data layer that also powers its Copilot product. Demandbase wins on orchestration depth plus its own contact data. That pattern is the market's answer to a question Gartner now asks in print: where does the ABM platform end and the GTM data platform begin?
Data companies won an advertising scorecard
ABM platforms still do what the name says: account discovery, planning, engagement, and reporting, with display, social, email, and sales engagement on top. The advertising is real. It is just no longer the product.
The product is the account list. Which accounts to target, why, when, and who inside them. The sales alert that fires when a target account spikes on an intent signal. The display budget that follows the signal rather than a demographic. The account summary a rep reads before the call. All of that runs on data before it touches a single ad server.
The category was always called account-based marketing, but through its first editions the scorecard graded audience assembly and media delivery. This edition grades data quality, predictive accuracy, and orchestration. The vendors that stayed on top are the ones who read the scoring change first.
Three out, three in
The 2024 edition, published November 11, 2024, evaluated 6sense, Demandbase, Dun & Bradstreet, Expandi Group, N.Rich, RollWorks, Terminus, and ZoomInfo. The 2025 edition brought in Propensity, Madison Logic, and NextRoll. Dun & Bradstreet, RollWorks, and Terminus left. Terminus exited the category the hard way: it was acquired by DemandScience and now operates as its ABM arm.
ZoomInfo's arc is the promotion story. A Visionary in 2023, a Leader in 2024, a Leader again in 2025, powered by the same data layer that feeds the rest of its GTM business. Demandbase has now been a Leader for five consecutive years, which traces the quadrant back to its first edition in 2021. Before that, Gartner's coverage of this market ran through TOPO's Market Guide for Account-Based Marketing Platforms, and the 2018 and 2019 editions of that guide carry Gartner's brand after the TOPO acquisition.
The November 2025 Magic Quadrant for Account-Based Marketing Platforms, fact by fact
Published November 6, 2025, authored by Jenifer Silverstein, Ray Pun, Upasna Chandna, and Chris Chandler. Eight vendors, four quadrants.
The Leaders are 6sense, Demandbase, and ZoomInfo. 6sense is cited for predictive AI built on longer training data, deeper account-intent scoring, account-graph mapping, and sales and marketing alignment. Demandbase sits furthest on Completeness of Vision with the most forward movement of any vendor, and in the companion Critical Capabilities report it holds the top score across all three use cases: new account acquisition, account retention, and account expansion. ZoomInfo takes its second consecutive Leader placement.
The Challenger is Propensity, on its first-ever appearance, a contact-level ABM platform supporting more than twenty channels and deep CRM integrations. Strong execution, shorter vision history.
The Visionary is Madison Logic, praised for expanded paid media, audio ads, content syndication, connected TV, video, native display, and LinkedIn social ads, plus a simplified pricing model. Its cautions are concrete: a direct-sales-only channel, no self-service value assessment tool, and limited options for account engagement scoring and journey analytics configuration.
The Niche Players are N.Rich and NextRoll. N.Rich is cited for a weekly product release cadence, EU data residency options with regional data centers, and its Aurora AI ad-creation assistant; the cautions are limited thought leadership, a thin implementation partner network, and sales alerts that arrive only as weekly emails. NextRoll, with its AdRoll ABM offering, brings roughly 130 agency partners, a six-language interface with intent keywords in more than fifty languages, and the Command Center dashboard combining account fit, intent, and engagement. Expandi Group also appears among the evaluated vendors; its placement has not surfaced publicly.
A note on the record. The full quadrant write-ups have not been widely republished. Placements and cautions here are reconstructed from Gartner's published excerpts and vendor announcements, and that is the public record as it stands.
What Gartner says is blurring
The report's own trend list names the blur directly. ABM platforms are overlapping with B2B marketing automation platforms, sales engagement applications, customer intelligence applications, and GTM data applications. The AI trend runs alongside: AI agents, generated ad copy, generated email, account summaries for sales, all moving toward cross-channel optimization of audience engagement.
The practical consequence is a boundary question. If the ABM platform, the marketing automation platform, and the CRM each hold a version of the account, the scorecard's data strengths mean nothing in your stack. Gartner's advice embedded in the trend is to decide which capabilities belong where before buying any of them. That sentence is a buying process, not a footnote.
The adoption numbers that limit the quadrant
Gartner's own distribution numbers describe who this market actually serves. Sixty two percent of customers are in North America, twenty nine percent in EMEA, and the technology sector accounts for roughly forty five percent of the customer base. Most platforms ship an English-only interface.
For a European buyer the numbers matter twice. First, the feature sets are shaped by the tech-marketer profile, not yours. Second, data residency. Only N.Rich leads with EU data residency options, and it sits in the Niche quadrant, which tells you how the rest of the field handles the question by default. GDPR is a criteria problem this quadrant's concentrated market has not yet forced.
The second scorecard, published four days later
The Critical Capabilities for Account-Based Marketing Platforms published November 10, 2025, four days after the quadrant. The quadrant ranks the company. The Critical Capabilities scores the product on specific jobs, and the distance between the two is where buying decisions live.
Demandbase's top score across acquisition, retention, and expansion is the strongest single claim in this year's research. A buyer whose purchase is really about account expansion, not net-new logos, should weight that use-case column ahead of the quadrant picture. The quadrant tells you who competes. The use-case scores tell you what they compete at.
What the tier table will not tell you
The tier table is a snapshot from November 2025, and the next edition is slated for late September 2026. In a category where three of eight vendors can rotate in one year, nine months is a long time.
The cautions are the other limit. Only some placements have public cautions, and a buyer relying on placements alone is shopping on half the evidence. The gaps in the public record are not gaps in the report.
And one thing vendor marketing never says about the data companies on top: the data is the moat and the lock-in at the same time. When you buy the ABM platform, you also buy the data pipeline's terms, its refresh cadence, and its price. The quadrant rewards data strength. It cannot price what leaving costs.
Four questions the November scorecard cannot answer
Which system owns the account record in your stack? If the answer is your CRM, buy orchestration. If it is the ABM platform, buy data quality first.
What is the intent signal made of, and can the vendor show the provenance under GDPR review in your markets?
Which use case is the purchase actually for? Acquisition, retention, or expansion, and does the Critical Capabilities score for that job match the quadrant story?
Do you look like this market's customer? If you are not a North American technology marketer, the adoption profile may say more than the tier.
Analyst Source
Gartner Magic Quadrant
Category definition, vendor inclusion, and quadrant placement in this article draw on Gartner's coverage of account-based marketing platforms, evaluated in the Magic Quadrant for Account-Based Marketing Platforms, published November 6, 2025, covering eight providers on the Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision axes, authored by Jenifer Silverstein, Ray Pun, Upasna Chandna, and Chris Chandler. The companion Critical Capabilities for Account-Based Marketing Platforms followed on November 10, 2025. Prior editions run back to the quadrant's first edition in 2021, preceded by TOPO's 2018 and 2019 Market Guides.
Source research
- Magic Quadrant for Account-Based Marketing Platforms (Gartner reprint, November 2025)
- Critical Capabilities for Account-Based Marketing Platforms (November 2025)
- Demandbase: named a Leader in the 2025 Magic Quadrant
- Propensity: named a Challenger in the 2025 Magic Quadrant
- ZoomInfo: named a Leader in the 2024 Magic Quadrant
Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
Worth reading alongside this one is Advertising Platforms. Gartner skipped the quadrant for this category entirely and published a warning instead: by 2028, over 70 percent of ad spend will run through AI-priced self-serve platforms nobody independently audits.
This market sits next to Intent Data Providers For B2B, covered separately on this site. Non-English intent signal is still under twenty percent of total volume industrywide, which means most platforms are seeing a fraction of the buying activity happening outside English language markets.